Pro+ · live
Google Search Console
OAuth-connect your verified property. Daily sync correlates AI citations with branded organic clicks — the only AI visibility tool that bridges the two.
Docs →
See exactly where ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI describe — or ignore — your brand. Then get the exact Reddit comment, email, or GitHub PR ready to paste — and the Outcome Loop measures whether it actually moved your AI visibility 14 days later. No other tracker closes that loop.
Best fit: indie SaaS · AI tools · dev tools. Free check works for any domain, but our paid tracking is tuned for SaaS go-to-market — not e-commerce, local biz, or enterprise.
Now scanning · 1 of 3
1/3 engines cite GEO Tracker for this query
Auto-rotating
Live · last hour of audits across GEO Tracker
Brands sampled · not customer data
You're not alone · 8 posts · 4 communities
This already happened to founders with great SEO — eight verbatim posts from r/SaaS, r/SEO, r/marketing, and r/Entrepreneur, all in the last 18 months. Same shock, different brands. If you haven't checked where AI puts you yet, you're reading this at the right time. If one of these reads like your week — keep scrolling.
We rank #3 on Google for our main keyword. Good DA, solid backlinks, the whole SEO playbook executed perfectly. But when I asked ChatGPT 'What's the best [tool for our use case]?' — we weren't mentioned. Ever. Our competitor (who ranks BELOW us on Google) got recommended 78% of the time. Us? 0%.
My site ranks top 3 for a bunch of good keywords in regular Google search, traffic is steady around 5k organic visits a month, but when I check AI tools like Perplexity or ChatGPT search, we get zero mentions. Not even a nod. Your thoughts would save my sanity.
A lot of these tools feel like classic SEO dashboards, just rebranded for AI. Expensive plans, fuzzy scores, and not always clear what you're supposed to do with the data.
Same story: abstract metrics, black box scoring, and pricing that assumes you'll pay forever just to "keep an eye" on things you don't fully control anyway. Missing anything actionable beyond "you appeared X times."
If AI visibility tools can't tie mentions to traffic or signups, they're just dopamine dashboards.
Maybe it's already part of the deal but what happens after the alert? If your tool flags a problem but provides no recovery protocol, you're not finished building. Awareness without solution just creates more work.
Manual checks feel pointless at scale.
Pay attention to WHICH sources get cited when your competitors show up. That's basically a roadmap of where you need to be mentioned. If ChatGPT keeps citing some specific comparison blog when recommending your competitor, that's a target for you to get included.
The invisible loss
Buyers no longer Google “best tool for X” — they ask AI, and it hands back a shortlist. Traditional analytics only starts after a click. AI-mediated discovery shapes that shortlist before a click exists. If your brand is missing from AI answers, you lose awareness and consideration before analytics can ever attribute the loss.
Your dashboard reports 1.2% conversion. The honest number is "we got the click from the 12 buyers AI did not eliminate first." The 988 are demand that disappeared before any pixel could fire.
Find out how many of those buyers actually see your brand — in 60 seconds, no signup.
Check your AI visibility — freeMeasuring brand presence across
The gap
Every tool in the category — at every price point — surfaces the same diagnosis: here are the URLs AI cites for your queries, here is your share of voice, here is who beats you. Then they hand the patient back to themselves with a bill. The comment, the email, the pull request — those are still on you. We ship them.
The category floor
The action layer
4-state actionability per cited URL
Live · Limited · Frozen · Manual — every URL is classified before we burn a token
Reddit comment generator
Subreddit-specific etiquette, disclosure baked in, 80–160 words, no superlatives
Email pitch to listicle / blog / news authors
Subject + one specific data point + soft ask + author email auto-detected
GitHub PR for awesome-list inclusion
Title + body + the exact markdown line + one-click "Open README in editor"
Hacker News reply + podcast guest pitch
Tuned to HN density rules · 2–3 episode angles for podcast hosts
Frozen-source replacement strategy
Archived Reddit → search r/<subreddit> · Locked HN → submit your own · Defunct domain → AI re-indexes in 2–4 weeks
Closed-loop outcome tracking
14 days after you mark posted, we re-count citations — "+5 across 3 queries" or honest "no measurable change"
Every promise above is shipped end-to-end. Every example the next section shows is from real production data.
See it click-by-clickCitation Source Intelligence
Four actionability states, one lookup per cited URL. For Live and Limited venues we generate a paste-ready draft. For Frozen we refuse to spend tokens and surface the replacement strategy. For Manual venues we hand off the link with a hint. All four examples below come from the production dataset of a real Pro user (Netlify on netlify.com).
octopus.com
Citations
30
Authority
6.5/10
Cross-query
2
Cross-engine
1
Competitors
3
Status
live
Competitors mentioned in this source
DRAFT · EMAIL PITCH
Position your brand as preview/edge complement
Subject
Quick suggestion for your '13 Deployment Tools' post
Before you post
FIVE DRAFT GENERATORS
Reddit comment culture is not Hacker News culture is not journalist inbox culture. We tune the prompt, the length, the disclosure rules, and the etiquette guards per platform.
Mentions your brand alongside 1-2 alternatives, never in isolation. Subreddit-specific etiquette for r/SEO, r/SaaS, r/devops, r/programming + 7 more. 80-160 words, no emojis, link-capped.
One-line "I work on …" affiliation, 60-150 words, drops one specific signal (number / benchmark / gotcha). Auto-locked threads (>14 days) skip drafting and surface "submit your own Show HN" instead.
Subject (≤8 words, references the article), one specific data point about your brand, soft ask matched to "If you're updating in Q3 / no rush". Author email auto-detected → mailto: pre-filled with subject + body.
Title + body + the exact markdown line in a code block. One-click "Open README in editor" lands you in GitHub's web editor on the repo, ready to fork and commit. CONTRIBUTING.md reminder always shown.
Subject + 2-3 specific episode angles (each = a tentative episode title + a one-sentence hook) + one-line bio + soft ask. Never "do you have 15 minutes for a call." mailto: pre-fill or Listen Notes search fallback.
The closed loop
Every action you mark posted goes into a 14-day citation delta tracker. Real before/after numbers per source, per query. No guessing whether the work moved the needle — and no overclaiming when it didn't.
Example data. Real outcomes vary by query competitiveness, source authority, and draft quality.
When you see it. Available on Pro and Business. The 14-day window starts the moment you click “Mark sent” — first outcome appears at day 14 or sooner via weekly cron.
Confidence bands
How we honestly grade every outcome
Delta is consistent across every engine your plan runs AND the cited source is still live. Signal is real.
Delta shows on 1–2 engines OR the cited source went archived after action. Signal is real but partial.
Delta is below noise floor (±1 citation) OR window overlapped with a model update. Honest "no measurable change."
Run a real Perplexity Snapshot on your domain or click an example brand to see what Pro tracks across 3 engines.
Example brands · Pre-computed mock data showing how Pro tracks ChatGPT + Perplexity + Google AI Mode together.
Bonus tool · beta
See what AI gets wrong about your brand — ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode probed with 3 factual questions.
The plumbing
GEO Tracker doesn’t sit in a silo. We pull from Search Console — then write back into Slack, your IDE, and your weekly inbox. Citations are useless without context; we give you both.
Coming next
OAuth-connect your verified property. Daily sync correlates AI citations with branded organic clicks — the only AI visibility tool that bridges the two.
Docs →
OAuth 2.1 + PAT. 10 production tools usable from Cursor, Claude Code, VS Code, ChatGPT. Query status · competitor gap · fix suggestion — all from your IDE.
Docs →
Incoming Webhook (anti-SSRF validated). Cron mirrors every score-drop or new-competitor alert into your Slack channel with the action attached.
Weekly digest of GEO Score delta, new citations, competitor activity. Plus daily alerts for paid tiers — no separate inbox to babysit.
The Score · How the math works
Drag the sliders. The GEO Score recomputes live with the same formula we ship to production — confidence-weighted, mention-rate · baseline-lift quality, summed across engines. These three are the top-weighted of the five live engines, shown here as a hands-on subset. No black box. No retroactive recalibration.
GEO Score (live)
Mention rate (w. avg)
40%
Avg quality
69
Baseline lift
0.40
// per engine
effective = rate × (0.4 + (1 − 0.4) × quality)
// final
score = Σ (weight_i × effective_i) / Σ weight_i × 100
Per-engine inputs · drag to recalc
I.
Same canonical question, same engine API, same time of day. No variant drift. No recency bias.
II.
Regex baseline + LLM refine for long-tail. Falls back deterministically on every error. Quality snapped to {0, 40, 70, 90} bands.
III.
Verified questions weigh 1.0 · Worth tracking 0.7 · Off-target 0.3. Stop scanning noise. Real signal wins.
What no other AI visibility tool ships
Every dashboard in the GEO category measures. We're the only one that explains why you lose, drafts the action that flips it, and proves whether it worked 14 days later. Verify each claim below — every link goes to the actual spec or feature doc.
On every losing query, open the Competitor tab in the Query Intelligence panel and read 3 evidence-backed reasons the winner ranks first + 3 ranked actions to flip it, with a predicted GEO lift and a confidence band. Other tools chart the gap; we explain it.
See methodologyWhen you mark an action posted, we anchor a 14-day pre/post citation window on that source and re-count. Cards then show "Drove +5 citations across 3 queries (high confidence)" or "No measurable change" — never "trust us, this lifted you".
How outcomes are measuredEvery cited URL is classified by venue health before we draft. Frozen sources (archived Reddit, locked HN, defunct domains) get a replacement strategy with a one-click URL — not a wasted draft. We refuse to act in dead venues.
Read the classifier specMost "AI is invisible to me" problems start with a misconfigured robots.txt or X-Robots-Tag — not content. We grade your site against 16 critical AI crawlers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Perplexity, Google, Apple, Meta, ByteDance, ...) and ship the exact snippet for app/robots.ts or your CDN.
See the bot matrixDaily cron walks every Business domain and emails when GEO Score drops ≥10 pts week-over-week or a new competitor appears in 3+ of your queries. Same triggers mirror to a Slack Incoming Webhook (HTTPS-validated, anti-SSRF). Each event announced once — no spam.
How alerts workBootstrapped, founder-led, AI-augmented engineering — every product decision passes through one operator, every user gets the same inbox. How it's funded →
FREE OFFER
Find out whether AI systems surface your brand before you spend another month guessing.
Start free auditPricing · Spectrum view
Free watches Perplexity. Starter adds ChatGPT. Pro adds Google AI Mode plus the monthly audit and the Outcome Loop — the closed loop that proves whether your fixes moved your AI visibility. Priced in plain AI responses per month, not credits. 14-day Pro trial, card required, auto-downgrades to Free — no surprise charges.
See if Perplexity even mentions you. 1 domain.
up to ~12 AI responses/mo
“Am I in ChatGPT?” Monitoring for one brand. Dashboard only.
up to ~1,320 AI responses/mo
4 engines daily + monthly audit + proof your fixes worked. Most teams pick this.
up to ~4,400 AI responses/mo
Card required · auto-Free if no plan
Everything in Pro at team volume + real-time alerts. 1 domain today · 3 soon.
up to ~16,250 AI responses/mo
Everything in Business at agency volume. 1 domain today · 10 + multi-region soon.
up to ~46,500 AI responses/mo
No credit card on Free · Cancel anytime · 30-day money-back guarantee
All plans · 1 domain today · invoice on annual
Honest rows — pricing, free trial, engines covered, action layer, target buyer. Each page also tells you when the other tool is the better pick.
vs Profound
Profound alternative for indie SaaS founders
Profound is the enterprise leader in AI search visibility. GEO Tracker AI is the self-serve, $129/mo option built for solo founders and small teams.
Read the comparison
vs AthenaHQ
AthenaHQ vs GEO Tracker AI
Both track your brand across AI engines. The differences are pricing, motion, and what each tool tells you to do AFTER the scan.
Read the comparison
vs Otterly.ai
Otterly.ai alternative — when you want the action layer too
Otterly.ai is the lightweight tracker. GEO Tracker AI matches the tracking and adds the part Otterly leaves to you: 3 ranked actions per losing prompt, with paste-ready drafts, measured 14 days later.
Read the comparison
Built for the communities AI actually cites
GEO Score formula and engine weights documented in our public docs.
We benchmark public AI responses. No buyer data, no tracking pixels.
You always review and post. We never touch your accounts or threads.
Community · Open forum · Async by default
No marketing case studies. Receipts and counter-examples from people shipping this week.
Disclosure: I work in devtools and ran this experiment across 6 portfolio brands over the last 4 months. All 6 are now showing up in Perplexity citations on ca…
Putting this out for the room. I've sat through three pitches in the last month from agencies offering 'GEO services' at 2-3x their old SEO rate. The deliverab…
Tired of opinion threads on whether llms.txt 'works', so I instrumented it and watched the logs. Setup: llms.txt deployed on 3 sites I run (one B2B SaaS, one o…
Or post your own — async, no calls.
Browse by topic
FAQ
Straight answers on methodology, limits, and what this product is — and is not.
Personal chats vary based on history, memory, timing, follow-ups, and model behavior. GEO Tracker AI does not try to replicate one person's chat. It uses a controlled benchmark setup so teams can compare results across runs and over time.
Start free — see exactly where AI cites them instead of you. Then get the drafts that flip it, and proof it worked 14 days later. Want a second pair of eyes? The founder will go through your results with you — just reply to your welcome email.
★ 50+ founders have already checked where AI puts them
What founders find when they look
Most founders have never checked where AI puts them.
The ones who do are usually surprised. Here is what we have actually run — and the part no other tool in this category offers.
Built in public — we publish the receipts
22 SaaS brands, scanned in public
A snapshot of where every brand in the indie-SaaS niche stands across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode. The same scan pipeline you would run on your own domain — published openly.
Read the benchmarkGEO Tracker AI scored 0/100 on launch day
We tracked our own brand visibility from day one. Day one = zero citations. The full transparent walk-through of how we moved off the floor — a useful template if you start from the same place.
Read the case studyMethodology — engines, scoring, smart cadence
Exactly how each scan runs, how the GEO Score combines mention rate × quality × engine weights, and what we explicitly do NOT claim. Measurement transparency over SEO-by-promise.
See the methodologyThis isn't an anonymous SaaS tool. It's a working relationship.
Every paying customer gets me directly. I go through your results, re-check them by hand, and help you build the action plan — including moves the system doesn't suggest yet. No ticket queue, no chatbot, most replies the same day. Most tools in this category start at $200/mo and you never reach a human. Here, you reach me.
Email the founder directly →